Legal Opinion

Louisville Planing Mill Co. v. Weir Sheet Iron Works

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Sampson—

Affirming.

Tlie appellant planing mill company employed appellee Weir, operating under the name of Weir Sheet Iron Works, to erect certain sheet iron pipes in and about its mill, agreeing to pay therefor $40.00 per day for said services. Appellee Weir with his helpers performed the services and erected the pipes, but it took him a longer time than appellant- milling company anticipated, and longer that it avers in its answer appellee Weir assured the company it would take to accomplish the work. For this reason the planing mill company, to whom…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Big Four Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Warren Oil & Gas Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Commonwealth v. SilerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Providence Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Cady v. KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Shermco Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the United States Air ForceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API