Legal Opinion
Kasishke v. Keppler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1947No. 3370PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
L. G. Keppler instituted this action against A. H. Kasishke and his alter ego, the Coralena Oil Company, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to recover a Jieth interest in certain oil properties and for an accounting. Kasishke and the Oil Com*810pany have appealed from a judgment in favor of Keppler.
The trial court found that in March of 1934 Kasishke entered into an oral contract with Keppler whereby Keppler was to use his skill and talents as a geologist in locating and recommending potential oil and gas properties to Kasishke for his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seymour v. FreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Kasishke v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Thompson v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Savings & Loan Corp. v. BearSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Nix v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Frazell v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Catlett v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- McLaughlin v. Laffoon Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc. v. ParrishDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.