Legal Opinion

Global Protection Corp. v. Halbersberg

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 1998No. 2856PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

Global Protection Corporation filed this action against David Halbersberg and his numerous businesses alleging common law trademark infringement, common law trade dress infringement, civil conspiracy, and unfair trade practices. Judgment was entered against Halbersberg for $1,249,451.38. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Global developed its novelty glow-in-the-dark condom, called “Knight Light,” in 1989 and began marketing it in early 1990. In July or August 1990, Halbersberg purchased boxes of the Knight Light in Myrtle Beach. In 1991 Halbersberg traveled to Korea to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Hegler v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Waggoner Motors, Inc. v. Waverly Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
  4. Harris-Jenkins v. Nissan Car Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Seabrook Island Property Owners' Ass'n v. BergerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API