Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2014No. S-13-557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. YOUNG 749 Cite as

287 Neb. 749

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Affirmed. Wright and Stephan, JJ., not participating. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Antoine D. Young, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 21, 2014. No. S-13-557. 1. DNA Testing: Appeal and Error. A motion for DNA testing is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and unless an abuse of discretion is shown, the trial court’s determination will not be disturbed. 2. ____: ____. In an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. PoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HaasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Potter v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. FairNebraska Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API