Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2018No. S-18-239PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCassel, J.

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 20 years after a jury convicted James E. Myers of murder, he filed a motion for testing under the DNA Testing **757 Act. The district court denied that motion as well as Myers' motion for the appointment of counsel. We would review these denials for an abuse of discretion. But to do so, the court below must have applied only the part of the legal framework governing whether to grant testing. Because the district court may have relied instead upon principles governing relief available after testing, we must reverse the order and remand the cause for reconsideration of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BronsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. Betancourt-GarciaNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McGuireNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Eric H. v. Ashley H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. AmayaNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. IldefonsoNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API