Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Fleming

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1941No. Civ. 2487; Civ. 2488PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is a motion for diminution of the record by incorporating therein a duly certified copy of defendant’s instruction number thirty. This instruction, as proposed, is not contained in the record. It contains, among other things, a quotation of the basic speed law as set forth in section 510 of the Vehicle Code, a statement that a violation of this basic rule is negligence, and the further statement that violation of law is of no consequence unless it be the proximate cause of the injury.

An identical instruction is set forth in the reporter’s transcript except that the word “maximum” is used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Brandes v. Rucker Fuller Desk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Fritsche v. McCueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Carter v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API