Legal Opinion

State v. Krauss

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 19368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The state introduced but a single witness, Beckman, who testified that he played the machine in question three consecutive times, inserting a 5-cent piece each time; that he received mints on each play, and that, in addition, on the second play, he received checks. These checks were not presented by the witness for redemption in merchandise in the store, but were retained as he says for evidence.

The defendant testifies that he did not cash the checks secured by the state’s witness, Beckman, and that on another occasion, on the same day, he refused to cash checks won by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Moberly v. DeskinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Verchereau v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. State v. GooginSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  5. State v. McTeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Superior Confection Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Troy Amusement Co. v. AttenweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. MacKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API