Ingram v. Yadkin River Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiffs’ from MoElroy, J., at first September Term, 1920, of RICHMOND. Civil action to recover damages for alleged ponding of water against and sobbing lands of plaintiffs by reason of defendant’s concrete dam and flash dam at Blewett’s Falls on tbe Pee Dee River. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
The record contains no proper statement of case on appeal. The case, as settled by the trial judge, is not signed by him; and there is no agreed statement of the case. This was a matter of procedure to which the appellants should have given proper attention. C. S., 642, 643, and 644; Holloman v. Holloman, 172 N. C., 835; Gaither v. Carpenter, 143 N. C., 241; Stevens v. Smathers, 123 N. C., 499.
Upon the argument it developed that there’is a-difference between Counsel as to what contentions, if any, were abandoned by plaintiffs during the trial in the Superior Court with respect to the alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coble v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Hill ex rel. Ray v. Director-General of RailroadsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Lindsey v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Webb v. . RosemondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Holloman v. . HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Kannan v. . AssadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Leggett v. Southeastern People's College, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Roberts v. . GroganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.