Legal Opinion

Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Clapp

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 1998-1711PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 276.] RICHLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLAPP. [Cite as Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Clapp,

1998-Ohio-551.] Unauthorized practice of law—Individual not authorized to practice law in Ohio who prepares and files a motion and pleadings in court on behalf of his clients is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. (No. 98-1711—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 30, 1998.) ON FINAL REPORT of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court, No. UPL 97-2. __________________ {¶ 1}…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. ClappOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. EstepOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Akron Bar Ass'n v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CoatsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clapp & Affliliates Fin. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API