Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 2000No. 1999-1618PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 155.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. COLEMAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman,
2000-Ohio-288.] Unauthorized practice of law—Individual not authorized to practice law in Ohio gave legal advice and prepared and filed complaints for others in an Ohio court—Engagement in the unauthorized practice of law enjoined. (No. 99-1618—Submitted October 20, 1999—Decided February 23, 2000.) ON FINAL REPORT of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court, No. UPL 98-5.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Richland County Bar Ass'n v. ClappOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. TelfordOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Block, 87488 (4-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Kaferle, Exr. v. MKT Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Clareshire Court Condominium Unit Owners' Assn. v. MontillaOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.