Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1995No. 1995-1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. As the board concluded, “[t]he practice of law is not limited to the conduct of cases in court. It embraces the preparation of pleadings and other papers incident to actions and special proceedings and the management of such actions and proceedings on behalf of clients * * * and in general all advice to clients and all action taken for them in matters connected with the law.” Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23, 1 O.O. 313, 193 N.E. 650, paragraph one of the syllabus.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Nicodemus v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Green v. Huntington National Bank of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Duggins v. Steak 'N Shake, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. David and Bonnie Cavanaugh, for the Minor Child, Kyle Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API