Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bldg. Corp. v. Harrod

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1949No. 3804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

On November 7, 1932, The First National Building Corporation1 entered into a written lease with J. Q. A. Harrod and Laynie W. Harrod by which it leased to the Harrods part of room 10 and all of room 11 on the fourteenth floor of its office building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, at a rental of $1,200 per annum,, payable in monthly installments of $10(> each. The lease provided that it should run for a term of five years commencing December 1, 1932, and ending November 30, 1937. It further provided:

*108“This lease shall at the expiration of the above mentioned term, be renewed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. W. Trans. Co. of Buffalo v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  4. Shorter v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  5. Grant v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. In Re ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. de Chabert v. LounsburyMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1968
  4. Castle v. Double Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Jaynes v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API