Novash v. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRon an, J.
The plaintiff for four months previous to his accident, which occurred on November 1, 1933, had been employed by the defendant as an oil extractor. It was his duty to remove the shavings, chips, filings and other waste that resulted from the operation of certain machines. These machines used oil as a cutting lubricant, and a stream of oil was applied to the cutting tool which was a part of each machine. The machines were equipped with certain guards and splash pans to prevent the oil from going onto the wooden block floor. There was considerable oil used in the department in which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Cronan v. ArmitageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Gilchrist v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Corsick v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Watkins v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Shea v. Crompton & Knowles Loom WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Roberts v. Frank's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Doherty v. Paul's for Tires, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Godon v. McClureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947