Legal Opinion

Shea v. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1940PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries received by him while at work in *328the factory of his employer, the defendant, who was not a subscriber under the workmen’s compensation act.

The declaration alleged the negligent failure of the defendant to furnish him with a safe and suitable place to work, or with suitable means and appliances with which to do his work, or to warn him of any hidden dangers incident to his work. At some time before the trial a motion of the defendant for specifications was allowed by the court and the plaintiff specified, in substance, that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Nickerson v. GlinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Corsick v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Gerrish v. GerrishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Novash v. Crompton & Knowles Loom WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Zildjian v. ZildjianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Glynn v. BlomerthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Enga v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API