Legal Opinion
Whigham v. Muehl
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 20, 1987No. BK-118PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOANOS, Judge.
Appellant Horace Whigham (Whigham) appeals from an order of final judgment in which the trial court found no culpability, hence no liability, on the part of appellee Helen Muehl. Appellees (the Muehls) raise four issues on cross appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in finding a fraudulent securities transaction subject to the provisions of section 517.301, Florida Statutes; (2) whether the trial court erred in finding a fraudulent securities transaction under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (3) whether the trial court erred in finding Mama’s of North Florida, Inc.,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,189 First Virginia Bankshares v. Alan BensonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Cameron v. Outdoor Resorts of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Davis v. Las Ovas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Callaway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- State v. KlaymanSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Church of Scientology Flag Service Org., Inc. v. City of ClearwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Whigham v. MuehlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.