State v. Klayman
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
835 So.2d 248 (2002)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
David KLAYMAN, Respondent.
No. SC00-1723.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 14, 2002.
Rehearing Denied January 10, 2003.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm Beach, and August A. Bonavita, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
R. Mitchell Prugh of Middleton & Prugh, P.A., Melrose, FL, for Respondent.
SHAW, J.
We have for review Klayman v. State, 765 So.2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the district court certified the following question:
Should the supreme court's decision in…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- State v. BarnumSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.