Hallett v. Larcom
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County. The action was originally brought by Fred N. Hallett as plaintiff in his own name, for money alleged to have been advanced by himself. The defendant answered, denying all the allegations of this first complaint.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County. The action was originally brought by Fred N. Hallett as plaintiff in his own name, for money alleged to have been advanced by himself. The defendant answered, denying all the allegations of this first complaint. On the 26th of November, 1895, plaintiff Fred N. Hallett filed a motion that he be allowed to file an amended complaint, making M. B. Hallett plaintiff instead of himself, which the court allowed and the defendant assigns error thereon. No showing whatever was made to justify the dropping of Fred N. Hallett, who had brought the action,…
1Opinion of the Court
SHLLiyAN, O. J.
This action was originally brought by Fred N. Hallett, as plaintiff, against the defendant, R. E. Lar-*494com, for the recovery of $599:42, money alleged to have been advanced for the defendant, at his special instance and request, while said Hallett was acting as the agent for the defendant in leasing and taking care of certain lands belonging to defendant, situated in Nez Perces county, and collecting rent therefor. The defendant answered, denying all of the allegations of said complaint. Thereafter said Hallett, by motion, asked the court to be permitted to file an amended…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dubbers v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Thiessen v. RiggsIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sullivan Construction Co. v. Twin Falls Amusement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Anderson v. Star-Bair Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- In re NagaoDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1913
- Gilmore v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- United States ex rel. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. Burrell Construction Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1910