Thiessen v. Riggs
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perees County. The court should not have allowed the respondent any costs' whatever. The direction of this court was that the costs were to abide the result of the trial in the district court. The trial resulted in a verdict for the appellants, and the respondents are entitled to recover no costs. (Thiessen v. Biggs, ante, p. 21,, 46 Pae. 829; Griffith v. Montandon, 4 Idaho, 75, 35 Pac. 704.) files no brief.
1Opinion of the Court
Q.UAELES, J.-
This is an' appeal from an order, made after judgment, on contested motions, to retax costs. This *488cause was heretofore brought to this court on appeal, and this court dismissed the former appeal with the suggestion that the district court proceed to try the issues made by the pleadings, and directed that the costs should abide the general result. (See ante, p. 21, 46 Pac. 829.) The cause was thereafter tried to a jury on the eighth day of April, 1897, and a verdict was rendered for the defendants for the sum of fifty dollars, ancf judgment. therein entered. The defendants filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffith v. MontandonIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
- Thiessen v. RiggsIdaho Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ramsey v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Feenaughty MacHinery Co. v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Hallett v. LarcomIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897