Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Brockton

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 15, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRufo, J.

The defendant, City of Brockton, seeks relief under Dist./Mun. Cts. R A D. A, Rule 8C, from a trial court’s findings and ultimate judgment against it for damages assessed for excessive water use charges on the basis that the abatement procedures contained in G.L.c. 59, §§59-74 are a prerequisite to initiating an action in the District Court to recover for alleged overpayments of water and sewer charges. After the plaintiffs brought their action seeking to recover overpayments for water supplied by the City of Brockton, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leto v. Board of Assessors of WilmingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. New England Legal Foundation v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. City of Boston v. Second Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Epstein v. Executive SecretaryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forster v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API