Legal Opinion
Surge v. Massanari
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided July 20, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-M-1445-EPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McPHERSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is now before the court on the plaintiffs Amended Application for Attor ney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [“EAJA”], 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. # 23). 1 The plaintiff asserts that she is a prevailing party within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) in that pursuant to the court’s Order of 17 July 2000 the case was remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings (Doc. # 17). The plaintiff seeks fees of $ 5,036.03 and expenses of $57.37 (Doc. # 23, p. 3). For the reasons which follow, the plaintiffs Amended Application is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- American Civil Liberties Union v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- ACLU of Georgia v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Marvin KAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knudsen v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Hart v. Guardian Credit UnionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Fryar v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021