Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Pardridge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 64 Mich. 575.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The deceased, in his life-time, carried on the auction and commission business in the city of Detroit, first, under the name of Wardell & Walsh, and, after Ward-ell retired, Walsh took a special partner, named Jennings, and the business was then conducted under the name of Thomas Walsh & Co. Jennings died, and after his death Walsh continued the business alone under the same name.

The defendant resided in Chicago, and did business there, and carried on a branch store in Detroit under the name of Pardridge & Co., which was managed .by Mr. Nye and Miss Randall.

Walsh died on the evening of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Robinson ex rel. Cooper v. MagarityIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. White v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1846

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Willey v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Willey v. Crocker-Woolworth National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bullock v. UeberrothMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Youngblood v. BoakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Munton v. RutherfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API