Legal Opinion

Munton v. Rutherford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by John W. Munton against Martha C. Rutherford and Charles M. Beckwith, alleged copartners as Charles M. Beckwith & Co., for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Rutherford brings error. Plaintiff, a grain dealer, residing at Morgan, Mich., sold a car load of rye to Charles M. Beckwith & Co. for $235.90, and the sale was made with Mr. Beckwith exclusively.

Read the full summary

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by John W. Munton against Martha C. Rutherford and Charles M. Beckwith, alleged copartners as Charles M. Beckwith & Co., for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Rutherford brings error. Plaintiff, a grain dealer, residing at Morgan, Mich., sold a car load of rye to Charles M. Beckwith & Co. for $235.90, and the sale was made with Mr. Beckwith exclusively. Beckwith failed to pay, and plaintiff sued Beck-with and Mrs. Rutherford as partners, and recovered verdict and judgment. The case was submitted to the jury upon two theories:…

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

{after stating the facts). 1. Plaintiff introduced in evidence the record of a suit brought in justice’s court by one Comstock against defendant Beck-with. Mr. McGarry, one of the attorneys for appellant, appeared for the defendant in that suit, and Mr. Clapper-ton appeared for the plaintiff. Mr. McGarry raised the point that Mrs. Rutherford should have been made a co-defendant. By stipulation, she was made a co-defendant. This testimony was introduced under objection and exception. Mrs. Rutherford had no knowledge of that suit. She did not know Mr. McGarry, had not authorized him or any One…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson ex rel. Cooper v. MagarityIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Brennan v. PardridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anfenson v. BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. C. J. Litscher Electric Co. v. StilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Gettins v. HennesseyOregon Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API