Legal Opinion

Friedland v. Friedland

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Action for a dissolution of a partnership. Plaintiff moves for an order appointing plaintiff receiver of the partnership assets and permitting plaintiff to continue its business. Defendants cross-move for multiple relief.

The cross motion, addressed to the complaint upon which plaintiff’s request for relief is predicated, will first be considered. The first cause of action alleges the creation of the partnership to manufacture and sell fixtures and metal products under the name of Priedland Fixtures Co.; that plaintiff and the individual defendants as equal copartners created the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Lord v. . HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Bailly v. BettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Cohen v. ErdleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. People v. Manhattan RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ebker v. Tan Jay International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. R. C. Gluck & Co. v. TankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Berkule v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fazio v. TracyNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Jones v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API