Hall v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Jose L. LINARES, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is a motion to compel arbitration brought by Defendant AT & T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC (“Defendant” or “ATTM”) (Docket Entry # 75). Plaintiff Barry Hall (“Plaintiff’ or “Hall”), as class representative, has filed opposition as well as a motion to strike the declaration of Richard Nagareda that was filed in support of Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. (Docket Entry # 79) The Court decides the dual motions on the papers pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons set forth below, Hall’s motion to strike is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. AT & T Mobility, LLC v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010