Legal Opinion

Matheson v. Campbell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 27, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was a suit in equity by William J. Matheson against John Campbell for infringement of a patent for a color compound produced from coal-tar products.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Final hearing on bill for injunction and accounting. Complainant alleges infringement of patent No. 345,901, for naphthol-black color compound, granted July 20, 1886, to Meinhard Hoffmann and Arthur Weinberg, and assigned to complainant July 10, 1888.

A preliminary question suggested by defendant is whether an assignment which purports to have been executed before the consul general of the United States of Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany, is sufficiently proved by the signature of said consul general and the United States consulate general seal. I think this proof is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Tyler v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Houghton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Boyd v. CherryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1883
  5. Groth v. International Postal Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Salt's Textile Mfg. Co. v. Tingue Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1915
  2. Panzl v. Battle Island Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  3. Rem-Cru Titanium, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  4. Read Holliday & Sons, Ltd. v. Schulze-BergeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  5. La Maur, Inc. v. L. S. Donaldson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API