Panzl v. Battle Island Paper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal by defendant from an interlocutory decree of the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York granting an injunction against infringement of patent No. 644,367, granted to Romedius Panzl February 27, 1900, for improvements in composition of material for lining of vessels used for storing or boiling of corrosive liquids.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal by defendant from an interlocutory decree of the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York granting an injunction against infringement of patent No. 644,367, granted to Romedius Panzl February 27, 1900, for improvements in composition of material for lining of vessels used for storing or boiling of corrosive liquids. The opinion below is reported in 132 Fed. 607.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.
The court below has exhaustively discussed the prior art and explained its bearing upon the patent in suit, and in stating its reasons for the conclusions reached has fairly presented the issues of validity and infringement and the arguments by which the contentions of the parties are supported. The controlling questions herein may be summarized as follows: (1) The definition of chamotte. (2) The disclosures of the prior art. (3) Infringement.
As to the meaning of the word “chamotte,” the court says, inter alia, as follows: s,
“The testimony of the expert witnesses is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tyler v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Matheson v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Howland Falls Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
- Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Electric Smelting & Aluminum Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1894
- Moody v. FiskeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1820
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Munising Paper Co. v. American Sulphite Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Solva Waterproof Glue Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- LTV Steel Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Philip A. Hunt Co. v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
- Treibacher-Chemische Werke Gesellschaft mit Beschrankter Haftung v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.