Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Erdman v. LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 2010No. A08-1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

Sarah Erdman worked for Life Time Fitness, Inc., from June 1, 2005 until January 31, 2006. Life' Time classified Erdman as a salaried employee exempt from the overtime requirements of the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act (MFLSA). See Minn.Stat. § 177.21 (2008). At the end of 2005, Life Time made deductions from two of Erdman’s paychecks in order to recover bonus overpayments it made to Erdman earlier in the year. Erdman objected to the deductions and commenced an action against Life Time, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated employees. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Milner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral HomesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Karl v. Uptown Drink, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Taylor v. LSI Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. In re the Order to Comply: Labor Law Violation of Daley Farm of LewistonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API