Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 29, 1902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Fremont District Court. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. Action for personal injuries. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The accident resulting in the injury for which plaintiff seeks to recover occurred at Hastings, in this state, and was occasioned by the engine of a freight train, which ran against the plaintiff, who was on or near the track in front of the engine. The plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as a section hand, and on the morning of February 28, 1900, by the direction of the section foreman, he started east from the depot at Hastings, with a spike maul and some spikes, for the purpose of going along the track in order to make such repairs thereon as be might find to be necessary. The morning…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  2. Clark v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Masser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. O'Brien v. McGlinchySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Wilson v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Barry v. Burlington Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Hoffard v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Tilghman v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API