Legal Opinion
Coulson v. Coulson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1983No. 82-525PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting appellee relief from judgment pursuant to Civ. R. 60(B)(5). Civ. R. 60(B) states as follows:
“On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(B); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Josephine C. Toscano AKA Josephine C. Zelasko v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Edward Serzysko v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- William H. Kenner and Eleanor v. Kenner v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Scholler v. SchollerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Hill v. BriggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.