Edward Serzysko v. The Chase Manhattan Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
In 1965, appellant Serzysko brought an action against appellee Chase Manhattan Bank in the District Court for the Southern District of New York to recover damages allegedly resulting from violations of Federal Reserve Regulation U, which controls margin requirements for loans made for the pur pose of carrying or purchasing registered securities, in conjunction with certain loans made to him. In a meticulous opinion dismissing the complaint after trial without a jury, the district judge found that none of appellee’s officers had been aware of the falsity of appellant’s representations to them…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. ErdossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Estle Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Michael Krause v. R.O. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- John Demjanjuk v. Joseph PetrovskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.