Legal Opinion
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 10, 2019No. 2:11-cv-01016Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 PROTOCOL LITIGATION District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This document relates to: Plaintiff James Hanna. : SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON MOTION TO TRANSPORT This § 1983 case is before the Court on Plaintiff James Hanna’s Motion to Transport and for Order Authorizing Neuroimaging (Transport Motion, ECF No. 2436). On September 18, 2019, the Magistrate Judge denied the Motion on the grounds that the Court lacked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- American Telecom Co. v. Republic of LebanonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Gould, Inc., (86-3649), Plaintiff-Respondent, (86-8327) v. Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann and Trefimetaux, (86-3649), Defendants-Petitioners, (86-8327)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Baze v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.