United States v. Ott
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SESSOMS, Senior Judge:
Contrary to his pleas the appellant was convicted in a bench trial of four specifications of espionage related offenses. The sentence imposed included a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to airman basic, and confinement for twenty five years.
Three of the offenses were charged under Article 134, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 934, as violations of federal criminal statutes. The specifications allege (1) that Airman Ott took a government document with the intent or with reason to believe that the information was to be used to the injury of the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BelfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. KauffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. Major NIDAL M. HASANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020