Legal Opinion

United States v. Ott

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 25, 1988No. ACM 25710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

SESSOMS, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas the appellant was convicted in a bench trial of four specifications of espionage related offenses. The sentence imposed included a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to airman basic, and confinement for twenty five years.

Three of the offenses were charged under Article 134, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. § 934, as violations of federal criminal statutes. The specifications allege (1) that Airman Ott took a government document with the intent or with reason to believe that the information was to be used to the injury of the United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. BelfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. KauffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. Major NIDAL M. HASANArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API