United States v. Belfield
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is taken from a determination by the district court that certain electronic surveillance to which appellants were incidentally subject was legal under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.1 The district court made that determination ex parte after examination of an in camera Exhibit. Appellants challenge the procedures followed by the district court on both statutory and constitutional grounds. We affirm.
I. Background
A. Factual Background
Appellants, Horace Butler and Ali Abdul-Mani, were charged…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Abu-JihaadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SquillacoteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.