Legal Opinion

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. Regan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 26, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02004Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA’S Case No. 19-cv-02004-VC FUTURE, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 32 ANDREW R. WHEELER, Defendant. This case addresses the provisions of the Clean Air Act that restrict types of air pollution that are particularly hazardous to human health. The Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate the sources of this pollution in two primary ways. First, the agency must adopt “technology-based standards” to which polluters must adhere. As the name…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API