Legal Opinion
R.M. Parranto Co. v. Bernick
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1984No. C5-84-181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judgé.
Plaintiff R.M. Parrante Company, Inc. brought this action against defendant Ber-nick for a real estate commission allegedly due and owing. After a trial without a jury, the trial court ordered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from that judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
In July 1980 Leland A. Holm listed an improved commercial property in the St. Paul midway area with plaintiff R.M. Par-rante Co., a real estate brokerage firm. The listing agreement provided a commission to plaintiff if Holm sold or leased the property. In the months that followed plaintiff attempted to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nodland v. ChirpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Albers v. FitschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Relocation Realty Services Corp. v. Carlson CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- DELLWOOD ENTERPRISES v. Pac. Am. Real Estate FundDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atkinson v. Prudential Property Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Robert C. Atkinson, an Individual Robert C. Atkinson, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Prudential Property Company, Inc., an Illinois Corporation Defendant-Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellee Graybow-Daniels Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Westburne Supply, Inc., a Delaware Corporation United Westburne, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bondie v. Bic Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
- Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. WarnygoraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.