Legal Opinion
Stahl v. McGenty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1992No. C5-91-1933Published
1Opinion of the Court
486 N.W.2d 157 (1992)
Norman J. STAHL, et al., Respondents,
v.
James McGENTY, Appellant.
No. C5-91-1933.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 2, 1992.
Darron C. Knutson, Timothy K. Masterson, Winthrop & Weinstine, St. Paul, for respondents.
Gerald T. Laurie, Andrew E. Tanick, Lapp, Laurie, Libra, Abramson & Thompson, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and LANSING and SCHUMACHER, JJ.
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant James McGenty alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to compel arbitration, that such order is presently reviewable, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Henvit v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.