Legal Opinion

Henvit v. Keller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1944No. 33,744PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Streissguth, Justice.

This is an action at law to recover for fraud in inducing plaintiffs to enter into a ten-year lease of an apartment hotel. The only damage alleged is the loss of anticipated net profits in the operation of the hotel, computed at $8,000 per year over the term of the lease. The appeal is from an order striking out certain allegations of an amended complaint on the ground that they were irrelevant, redundant, or indefinite.

The amended complaint contains numerous allegations of misrepresentation as to the completeness of the furnishings of the hotel, its state of repair, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Greear v. PaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. McCreight v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Seifert v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. General Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
  4. L'Evesque v. RognrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. First Avenue Realty Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API