Legal Opinion

Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 95-460PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Kempf applies for exemption from the sales tax under R.C. 5739.02(B)(19), which provides:

“The tax does not apply to the following:

u * ❖

“(19) Sales of * * * braces or other devices for supporting weakened or non-functioning parts of the human body * * * [and] crutches or other devices to aid human perambulation * * *.”

Kempf argues that these devices technologically replace braces and are exempt under R.C. 5739.02(B)(19), or that they aid human perambulation and are exempt also under R.C. 5739.02(B)(19). We agree with the BTA that these devices are not braces under this exemption, but find that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maxxim Med., Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Maxxim Med., Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API