Legal Opinion
Maxxim Med., Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1999No. 1998-2252PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 337.] MAXXIM MEDICAL, INC., APPELLANT, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as Maxxim Med., Inc. v. Tracy,
1999-Ohio-136.] Taxation—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals finding transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators and neuromuscular electrical stimulators subject to sales tax affirmed. (No. 98-2252—Submitted June 23, 1999—Decided December 29, 1999.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-X-224. __________________ {¶ 1} Maxxim Medical, Inc. (“Maxxim”) sells and leases transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hatchadorian v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacDonald v. Shaker Hts. Income Tax Bd. of Rev.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tetlak v. BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Shugarman Surgical Supply, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002