Legal Opinion

Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 1995-0460Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 517.] KEMPF SURGICAL APPLIANCES, INC., APPELLANT, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. Tracy,

1996-Ohio-289.] Taxation—Sales tax—Orthotics—Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators and neuromuscular electrical stimulators—Board of Tax Appeals’ decision denying exemption under R.C. 5739.02(B)(19) reversed and cause remanded for determination whether the devices are exempt as aiding in human perambutation. (No. 95-460—Submitted November 9, 1995—Decided February 14, 1996.) APPEAL…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API