Simonia v. Glendale Nissan/Infiniti Disability Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Aleck Simonía appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for attorney’s fees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g). We affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer’s health care plan in Simonía v. Glendale Nissan/Infiniti Disability Plan, No. 09-55569, 2010 WL 1896455 (9th Cir. May 12, 2010). We stayed consideration of his attorney’s fee appeal pending the Supreme Court’s disposition of Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., - U.S. -, 130…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Gross v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Scarangella & Sons, Inc. v. Group Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Eileen M. Huss v. IBM Medical and DCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plan-Nonbargained ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.