Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plan-Nonbargained Program
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
(Docket No. 355)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Quiller Barnes initiated this action on behalf of himself and a class, asserting that Defendant AT & T Pension Benefit Plan — Nonbargained Program owed them additional benefits. Mr. Barnes asserted five claims for relief. On May 10, 2012, the Court addressed the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on three of the claims. The Court granted Mr. Barnes summary judgment on Count I of the complaint but granted the Defendant Plan summary judgment on Counts II and V. Subsequently,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gross v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Dowd v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Benjamin Wise v. Monterey County Hospitality Association Health and Welfare PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Board of Trustees of the PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Pension Fund v. SMAC Hawaii, Inc.; R&M Air Conditioning, LLC; Melvin E. Mung Lim, Jr., an individual; Margaret T. Mung Lim, an individual; Meghan M. Mung Lim, an individual; and Does 1–50District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.