Legal Opinion
In Re Johannes B. Buchner
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 26, 1991No. 91-1046PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Johannes B. Buchner appeals from the July 17, 1990, decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 89-2590, affirming the examiner’s rejection of all of his claims for failure to provide an enabling disclosure under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The claimed invention relates to a higher order digital transmission system which communicates a plurality of separate digital streams over a common channel. It includes a transmitter portion (block encoding arrangements and multiplexer) and receiver portion (a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Application of SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re BrandstadterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re EyndeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
3Cited by11 opinions
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Stephen E. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- STX, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Promega Corp. v. Novagen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac & UgineDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.