Legal Opinion

In re Brandstadter

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 20, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 3-9, and 11 of appellants’ application serial No. 528,852, filed February 21, 1966, for a “Message Retrieving Organization.” We affirm.

The Invention

The invention of the appealed claims is apparatus for allowing subscribers of a store and forward communications system to retrieve previously originated data messages. Each message is stored in a permanent file memory and coincidentally therewith the permanent file memory location of the message is stored in a cross-reference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of Walter D. Bernhart and William A. FetterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Hugo Ghiron and Werner UlrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. Application of Constantin ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Application of SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Stephen E. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., Appellant/cross v. Vega Servo-Control, Inc., Appellee/crossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. In re AltenpohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  5. In Re Johannes B. BuchnerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API