Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Garvan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1920PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Frederick Y. Robertson against Francis P. Garvan, as Alien Property Custodian, and others.

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

On September 29, 19.14, the Mammoth Copper Mining Company entered into a contract with Beer, Sondheimer & Co., dated August 24, 1914, reciting a consideration of “one dollar each to the other in hand paid * * * and the mutual terms and agreements” therein contained, whereby the former agreed to sell and deliver, and the latter to purchase and receive, “the total production of zinc crude ore shipped by the seller from its properties in Shasta county, California.” The buyer was not bound to accept any of the product running less than 33 per cent, metallic zinc,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Wigand v. . Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Ramey Lumber Co. v. John Schroeder Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  2. American Handkerchief Corp. v. Frannat Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Marrinan Medical Supply, Inc. v. Ft. Dodge Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Imperial Refining Co. v. Kanotex Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Biersdorf v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API