Legal Opinion
United States v. Dusenbery
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 26, 2002No. 5:91-cv-00291PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
The government has moved to stay the re-trial of defendant Larry Dusenbery’s charge of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) (docket no. 632). For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED, and the re-trial of the CCE charge is stayed until after the final resolution of any and all appeals to any court filed by or on behalf of Dusenbery relative to his conviction or sentence for count two (conspiracy). Furthermore, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) of the Speedy Trial Act, the Court will exclude from speedy trial calculations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Petite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. William Bull Pringle, Iii, United States of America v. James Crawford McAfee United States of America v. Lloyd Cowan ParkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Mark A. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Raoul Barrie ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SabinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SandfordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018