Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Hill
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The plaintiff-respondent is the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company which renders telephone service in this and other states. The defendant-appellant is the Public Utility Commissioner of Oregon. When the company filed new tariffs and complained that existing rates were confiscatory the commissioner conducted hearings resulting in the order under review. The order prescribed new rates and charges, but in amounts less than the company sought. This is an appeal by the commissioner from a decree of the circuit court that sustained the company’s contentions. The present commissioner is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Valley & Siletz Railroad v. FlaggOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. HarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- United States v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Elkhart Tel. Co. v. Kansas Corporation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.