Legal Opinion
Ildefonso-Candelario v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 3, 2017No. 16-3625PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF. THE COURT
STEARNS, District Judge.
Petitioner Roman Ildefonso-Candelario challenges a ruling of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding an Immigration Judge’s determination that he is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal because of a prior conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. For the following reasons, we will grant the petition and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.
I. Background
Ildefonso-Candelario, a citizen of Mexico, entered the United States unlawfully, allegedly in 1996. In October of 2015, he pled guilty in Pennsylvania state court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Jan Knapik v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Ludimilla Ramos Da Silva v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Amilcar Francisco-Lopez v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- State v. AddaquaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Amilcar Francisco-Lopez v. Attorney General USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.