Legal Opinion
State v. Addaquay
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 30, 2017No. S17A1046PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINES, Chief Justice.
The State appeals from the habeas court’s order granting relief to appellee Thomas Addaquay on the ground that his plea counsel was *413constitutionally ineffective in incorrectly advising him of the immigration consequences of his plea of guilty For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
1. In 2012, Addaquay pled guilty to criminal damage to property in the second degree under OCGA § 16-7-23 (a) (1)1 for conduct that occurred in 2002 and was sentenced as for a misdemeanor, as permitted under OCGA § 17-10-5, to 11 months and 29 days on probation. At that time, Addaquay was a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Burt v. TitlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Karl Savoury v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- ALYAZJIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Ashish Sijapati v. Dana BoenteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dowdy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- The STATE v. ADDAQUAYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017