Legal Opinion

Ohio Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Fender

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1923No. 17565Published

1Opinion of the Court

At,pen, J.

This ease arises under subdivision 7 of Section 1027 of the General Code of Ohio, which reads, in part, as follows:

“Sec. 1027. The owners and operators of shops and factories shall make suitable provisions to prevent injury to persons who use or come in contact with machinery therein or any part thereof. * * *

“7. They shall guard all saws, wood-cutting, wood-shaping and all other dangerous machinery.” For convenience we shall call the defendant in error, Hannah Fender, the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error, the Ohio Automatic Sprinkler Company, the defendant, throughout this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Streeter v. Western Wheeled Scraper Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Jeffersonville Manufacturing Co. v. HoldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Evansville Hoop & Stave Co. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API